Thursday, April 24, 2008
Friday, February 29, 2008
hebrews is awesome
I got the privilege of starting us out in chapter 1, and quite frankly, it blew my mind. introductions to books of the bible don't usually do that. for instance, the writer of Hebrews was more than likely a Jew. we don't know that for sure, but his tone and knowledge of the Old Covenant seems to hint that he might be. if that is true, he may have very will upset a great deal of the Jewish community by writing Hebrews. in short, the author of Hebrews takes verse after verse of the Old Testament and says "if you are reading this and not thinking it is talking about Jesus, you're wrong." he's a little nicer than that, but essentially that's it. that's quite a bold statement, as Will Ferrell would say.
another thing I would mention is that if you're studying Hebrews, don't use the NIV. nothing against it necessarily; it just doesn't quite do a lot of parts justice. for example, take my favorite part of chapter 1:
(vs. 3, NIV) The Son is the radiance of God's glory and the exact representation of his being, sustaining all things by his powerful word.
Now, there's nothing really WRONG with this translation. but if you look up the Greek, it the word translated as "sustaining" is actually translated better "to carry; to carry some burden; to bear." I don't know about you, but the image of Christ sustaining all things and Christ bearing and carrying all things are two pretty different images.
and maybe this explains just why Jesus gets so mad at the Pharisees at one point for loading people down with burdens, and not "lifting even a finger" to help. maybe he is mad not because they aren't helping anyone but because they are painting the exact opposite picture that He came to paint. Jesus says he wants people to trade their burden for his, which is "light and easy to bear," while taking our personal burdens (assuming those are included in "all things") and bearing them himself.
so we need to be careful to help people carry their burdens, not just because Jesus said to help the needy, but because we shouldn't be painting the EXACT OPPOSITE picture of Christ to people. more on that next time. I'm late for class.
Thursday, February 14, 2008
the most awesome two-person band ever
Tuesday, February 12, 2008
laziness
Monday, February 4, 2008
pray
Donnie, one of the pastors at Freedom Fellowship in Greer, was hurried to the hospital this morning. He is currently waiting on a MRI to try and figure out what it is that is bothering him. That's all I can really say right now, but I'll try to keep everyone updated on what happens. Just please pray for Donnie and his family. thanks guys.
Friday, February 1, 2008
straight-up sweetness
In the meantime, for those of you wondering about what visual communication (the new major) involves, check out this website:
Trollback & Company
Jakob Trollback is the guy's name, and he's a graphic designer who started a company in New York City. He was in Columbia last night for an AIGA meeting. Basically, Trollback and Company does about one-third of all of the ads, movie opening sequences, and network promos you see on TV. You may want to go ahead and have an hour or two of your day blocked out though. This stuff, like I said, is sweet.
Saturday, January 26, 2008
shameless plug
JETHRO'S ADVICE MYSPACE PAGE
COREY CROWDER MYSPACE PAGE
Hope to see ya there!
p.s.--We'll be playing lots of "Christian" music.
Thursday, January 24, 2008
the verdict is in: I don't like Christian music
So I was importing some CDs into my new Mac (sorry, I had to get one more plug in for the new toy). I am mostly just putting worship-esque stuff on this laptop, since my entire 3,000 song library is on my Dell, and there's really no use in taking up just as much room on this computer too. So I am listening to each of these CDs as they are scanning, and I come to a conclusion: I really don't like Christian music that much. Let me explain.
First of all, I just don't like the idea of "Christian" or "Gospel" as a genre. I think it's kind of ridiculous. When I look on MySpace, I see bands classified as "Christian/Pop/Rock." This seems strange for me. It's strange because Dave Matthews isn't labeled "Political/Pop/Rock." And Bob Marley isn't labeled "Love/Reggae/Marijuana." And Kenny Chesney isn't labled "Childhood Memories/College Good Times/Country." Am I making any sense? It just seems like mentioning God in songs should only be a natural outgrowth of a Christian writer/performer, not a classification of his or her music. Keep in mind what I'm talking about here is the music that talks about God, rather than simply praise songs meant for corporate worship.
It's not so much that I hate the music. It's more that if I'm just riding around listening to music, I generally won't choose Chris Tomlin, or something of the like. I just think that sometimes music that is labeled "Christian" can be fairly un-Christian in the sense that it doesn't reflect any of the creativity instilled by God in the artist who created it. I say this because I recently heard someone say, in so few words, that the "Christian" music market was wonderful because it is appealing to a bigger and bigger audience, all it takes is "limited musical ability." Anyone can be a "Christian" artist.
I enjoy the fact that many artists are bucking this trend. David Crowder Band, for instance, keeps their songs very accessible while integrating technology into them. Bands like The Glorious Unseen and Jeremy Riddle are showing that you can be "Christian," "Secular," accessible and innovative all at the same time. Amen.
Tuesday, January 22, 2008
it has arrived
Saturday, January 19, 2008
i've got the golden ticket
wow. charlie and the chocolate factory. good movie. good movie indeed. but if you're wondering, that's not what this post is about. me and a couple friends, through visits to some pretty "conservative" (this is one of those labels that I really don't think even has a logical meaning any more), have heard plenty of what we like to call "golden ticket" theology. I don't mean for this post to be denouncing anyone who subscribes to this kind of thinking, and to a certain degree I think most all christians adhere to this. what I want to call attention to is the importance of it only being a PART of our faith, as opposed to all of it.
the "golden ticket" belief basically stresses that the goal of becoming a Christian is to obtain a way off of this earth, into heaven (hence, "golden ticket.") this is important. our belief in heaven and in our eternal life there is vital to our faith. the problem i think, though, is when this becomes our only goal in being a follower of Christ. This is how I heard it put about a week ago, by a youth pastor:
"this is a nasty, liberal world. and as Christians the only place we can find hope is in knowing that one day this world will be destroyed and we will go to heaven to be with God."
While this strikes me as somewhat true, telling half the truth is still telling a lie in a lot of ways. I think perhaps a better assessment would be:
"there are ugly things happening in this world, because of us. It's not God's fault. The world, as he made it, was good. He said so. all of the nastiness, the brokenness, happens not because of God, but because of a decision Adam made, which is the same decision we continue to make, trying to 'one-up' God. our only hope is Christ. we can look forward to the day when suffering is over, and we are at peace with God, but until then we have some responsibilities. we should be doing everything in our power to see God's kingdom come 'on earth, as it is in heaven.' not just idly waiting for the day when we get to see it in heaven. that idleness accomplishes absolutely nothing except contributing to the nastiness that we are so very opposed to as Christians."
for all I know, the youth pastor I heard, could have meant the latter, but only had time to say the former. the "nasty, liberal" thing just didn't strike me as all that Christ-like, that's all. To me, it just seems like when you read all the accounts of Jesus' teaching, you find a lot less about going to heaven to be with God than you do about bringing the kingdom of God, to earth. (hint: kingdom of God is related to heaven, but "kingdom of God" and "heaven" meaning a place believers go after the die, are not the same thing.) let me try to paint a picture of just why this "golden ticket" idea, by itself, seems so screwed up to me.
meet Jim Bob. Jim Bob has just bought a one-way plane ticket to Jamaica. He's never coming back. He has just retired and he's going to live in Jamaica forever. He can't wait. While he sits in the boarding area, with all the big windows watching airplanes outside, an officer alerts Jim Bob that everyone outside in the landing/take-off area is being overcome with a deadly virus, a virus which Jim Bob has already had, is immune to, and can make others immune to simply by shaking their hand. Jim Bob, though, acknowledges the officer and remains in his chair, watching people die outside, where his plane will be landing. because, after all, he wouldn't want to miss that plane.
I realize that's a little morbid, but essentially that's the kind of behavior that exclusively "golden ticket" kind of thinking draws you to.
I once heard it put this way: if people continue to drown in the river, we can go downstream and pull all the people out, but that's not change. that's not justice. justice is when one of us says "I'm gonna go upstream and figure who's throwing everybody in the river."
Thursday, January 3, 2008
welcome back, welcome back, welcome back
(a very confused 20 year old would also like to ask the brains behind Nick at Nite about the sudden promotion of shows like Home Improvement and Fresh Prince of Bel-Air to classic status, while nearly an entire decade of much better quality television, namely The Cosby Show and Saved by the Bell seem to have been skipped. I am not happy about this decision and will fight to the death in order to see Zach and Slater grace the screen once again.)
Anyway, since I already told all you faithful readers about my favorite thing about Christmas (see previous two posts), I figured I would use this one to tell you about some of the "stuff" I got, which is much less important, but still exciting. so here goes:
- MacBook laptop. okay, so I don't technically have this one yet, but I got some money for a start towards it, and hopefully it will be in my hands in the next week or two. around the same time, I will return to a regular diet of ramen noodles and grilled cheeses, and go on dates with said laptop, instead of with girls, because the macbook will, in comparison, be already paid for. (all of these events occuring immediately after buying a laptop out of pocket is a complete coincidence, of course.) hey, why not do stupid stuff while you're still in college and have an excuse for being stupid, right??
- Everything Must Change. Brian McLaren, in this semi-sequel to The Secret Message of Jesus, writes about how the message of the kingdom of God can, in many ways, provide real solutions to fighting the world's major problems of hunger, prosperity gaps, and war--stuff like that. not light reading to say the least. I'm almost done with it, and if you want a book to make you feel really uneasy yet really motivated at the same time, I say go for it. seriously.
- Wide Open Spaces and Divine Nobodies. These are both by Jim Palmer. I haven't really dug into them that much yet, but I'm sure, if you're a regular reader here, you will hear about them in the near future. the cover illustrations look real pretty though.
- Royal Dansk Danish Butter Cookies. I think I got 5 cans total, and they're pretty much all gone. these can light up my Christmas more than a hundred dollar bill. (okay, maybe a fifty. or a twenty, or...)
- Barnes & Noble Gift Cards. Talk about a gift that keeps on giving.